← Back to Impeachment Index

Random Political Joke - Politicians talk about “hard-working families” like they’re describing a rare, endangered species.

Spain

Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez

Spain flag Pedro Sanchez portrait

Impeachment Estimate

5%

Updated: 2026-01-06

Model Risk: 5%

Public Impeachment Search Heat: 0%

Regime Risk: 8% ? Regime Risk is completely separate from the impeachment estimate and is not used to calculate it. Regime Risk is an assessment of the overall stability of the current government regime, based on factors such as political unrest, economic instability, and social tensions. A high Regime Risk indicates a greater likelihood of significant political upheaval, which could lead to changes in leadership through means other than formal impeachment processes.

30-Day Impeachment Trend

30-Day Regime Risk Trend

Latest News

Spain 'strongly condemns' violation of international law in Venezuela, PM says - Reuters

Spain and five Latin American countries reject US attack on Venezuela in joint communiqué - Euronews.com

Spain will not recognize US intervention in Venezuela, PM says - Reuters

Spanish PM says Gaza, Venezuela and Ukraine territorial unity is not negotiable - Middle East Monitor

Spain’s ruling party faces crunch regional poll amid corruption and harassment claims - The Guardian


Quick Summary of Spain & Pedro Sanchez

Spain has recently been at the center of political turmoil following attempts to impeach Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez. In April 2024, Sánchez faced calls for his removal after allegations surfaced regarding potential corruption involving his wife, Begoña Gómez. Opposition parties, particularly the conservative People’s Party (PP) and the far-right Vox, accused Sánchez of failing to address the scandal transparently, arguing that his leadership had been compromised. The prime minister responded by temporarily stepping back from his duties to reflect on his political future, a move that sparked widespread debate about the stability of his coalition government. While no formal impeachment process exists in Spain’s constitution, the opposition pursued alternative legal and parliamentary avenues to challenge his position, though these efforts ultimately failed to gain sufficient traction. The controversy highlighted deeper divisions within Spanish politics, with Sánchez’s Socialist Party (PSOE) rallying behind him while critics accused him of using the crisis to consolidate power. The prime minister eventually returned to office, framing his decision as a defense of democracy against what he described as a politically motivated smear campaign. The episode underscored the fragility of Spain’s governing coalition, which relies on support from smaller left-wing and regional parties. While Sánchez survived the immediate threat, the scandal has left lingering tensions, with the opposition vowing to continue scrutinizing his administration. The situation remains a key talking point in Spanish politics, reflecting broader concerns about corruption, accountability, and the future of the country’s leadership.

Deep Dive Into Spain & Pedro Sanchez

International relations and European context
Externally, Spain’s position is relatively stable and anchored in the EU and NATO frameworks. Under Sánchez, Spain has maintained a broadly pro-EU stance, played an active role in debates on fiscal rules, green and digital transitions, and migration policy, and held the rotating EU Council presidency without major disruption. The government’s alignment with EU sanctions on Russia after the invasion of Ukraine and continued commitment to NATO, including hosting high-level summits, signal continuity in security policy. Some foreign-policy choices—such as the shift on Western Sahara positioning, a more assertive line on Palestine–Israel, or an emphasis on Latin American and Mediterranean partnerships—have sparked domestic debates but have not generated large-scale social unrest. Internationally, Sánchez is generally viewed as a conventional social-democratic leader within the European mainstream, despite his sharper domestic controversies. Tension in this domain is therefore mild and well within the bounds of normal democratic contestation.

Media environment and public discourse
Spain’s media environment is pluralistic but highly politicized, and Pedro Sánchez is a focal point in this polarization. Major newspapers, television networks, and digital outlets are aligned, explicitly or implicitly, with ideological camps, shaping public perceptions of Sánchez either as a pragmatic modernizer or as an opportunistic leader undermining institutional norms. The expansion of partisan talk shows, the strong role of social media, and the circulation of disinformation and hyperpartisan narratives have intensified the tone of debate. Government and opposition frequently accuse each other’s media allies of bias, while periodic controversies over state broadcaster RTVE and use of public advertising or communication strategies reflect underlying struggles over narrative control. Nonetheless, journalistic freedom is broadly respected, diverse viewpoints are accessible, and investigative reporting continues across the spectrum. The environment thus displays noticeable tension and fragmentation of the public sphere, but not systematic repression or crisis-level information disorder.

Political polarization
Spain exhibits significant but not yet systemic crisis-level polarization, and Pedro Sánchez is a central figure in this dynamic. Since his arrival as PSOE leader and later as prime minister, he has presided over a fragmented multiparty landscape where coalition and confidence-and-supply agreements with regional and nationalist parties (e.g., ERC, EH Bildu, Junts) have become routine. His decision to form and then normalize a governing partnership with Unidas Podemos/Sumar on the left, and to rely on pro-independence parties in key parliamentary votes, has intensified perceptions of a sharp left–right and centralist–peripheral divide. The amnesty law for Catalan separatists, framed by Sánchez as a tool for political normalization, has been interpreted by opponents as a breach of equality before the law and a transactional move to secure his investiture, thereby deepening partisan animosity. The rise and consolidation of Vox, together with a harder line from the Partido Popular (PP) in opposition, reflects and reinforces this polarized environment. Yet institutions continue to operate, alternation in power remains possible, and party competition is highly structured, so polarization is serious but still short of a systemic breakdown.

Social and economic stability
Despite political friction, Spain maintains a comparatively high degree of social and economic stability. Under Sánchez, macroeconomic indicators have been mixed but broadly compatible with European norms: robust tourism, gradual labor-market recovery post-COVID, active use of EU Next Generation funds, and reforms to labor legislation that have increased permanent contracts, even as youth unemployment, regional disparities, and housing costs remain significant structural problems. Social services continue to function, and there is no generalized breakdown in public order or basic welfare provision. Controversies around specific reforms—such as labor market changes, minimum wage increases, or housing regulation—generate political debate and sectoral protests but do not threaten overall stability. Sánchez’s governing style, emphasizing incremental social policy expansion (e.g., minimum wage, social transfers, and rights-based legislation in gender and family policy), coexists with a relatively predictable economic policy anchored in EU fiscal and monetary frameworks. For these reasons, underlying stability remains high, with tensions present but not acute by comparative standards.

Social tensions and territorial question
Overall social coexistence in Spain remains largely peaceful, but underlying tensions—especially around territorial and identity issues—are pronounced. The legacy of the 2017 Catalan independence crisis still shapes national politics, and Sánchez’s strategy of de-escalation through pardons, dialogue tables, and ultimately an amnesty has reduced the risk of immediate confrontation in Catalonia while redistributing tension to the broader national arena. Many citizens outside Catalonia view concessions to pro-independence actors as unfair or as rewarding illegality, and demonstrations against the amnesty and against Sánchez personally have been frequent and sometimes intense, though generally peaceful and institutionalized. Additional cleavages over immigration, gender equality laws, LGBTQ+ rights, housing affordability and labor precarity create pockets of localized strain and contentious protest, but these remain within the bounds of typical advanced-democracy contention. The combination of the unresolved territorial question and a perception, among critics, that Sánchez conducts high-stakes bargaining with separatist parties to sustain his parliamentary majority keeps social tension at a level clearly above normal but not equivalent to widespread unrest.

Trust in institutions and rule of law debates
Trust in Spanish institutions is moderate and contested, showing some erosion but not collapse. Sánchez’s tenure has coincided with prolonged deadlock over renewing the General Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ), heightened public disagreements between the executive and parts of the judiciary, and sharp partisan narratives about the politicization of courts and oversight bodies. Critics on the right argue that Sánchez attempts to capture or pressure institutions through appointments and legal changes, pointing in particular to the amnesty law, the use of emergency legislative procedures, and political rhetoric targeting judicial decisions. Supporters counter that his government is rebalancing historically conservative-leaning bodies and aligning institutions with democratic majorities. The monarchy, parliament, and regional institutions continue to operate with no sign of imminent breakdown, but mutual accusations of illegitimacy between major parties, and the framing of institutional disputes as existential, have a corrosive effect on perceived impartiality. The intensity is therefore above a calm, high-trust scenario but does not rise to systemic crisis, as institutional checks remain active and Spain still meets core rule-of-law standards typical of EU democracies.


Impeachment Color Legend

RED >= 50%
ORANGE >= 34%
YELLOW >= 18%
GREEN < 18%